- 最後登錄
- 2022-10-18
- 在線時間
- 0 小時
- 註冊時間
- 2009-7-17
- 閱讀權限
- 20
- 精華
- 0
- UID
- 6742377
- 帖子
- 240
- 積分
- 265 點
- 潛水值
- 26801 米
| 如果瀏覽伊莉時速度太慢或無法連接,可以使用其他分流瀏覽伊莉,www01.eyny.com(02,03)。 本帖最後由 EndlessAngel 於 2020-6-24 11:34 AM 編輯
Umm.....Hmm.....I wonder.......when the judges say "有教化可能"
"reformed", "rehabilitated.....how were they looking at it ? How was it determined ? What are the standards ? It's easy for the judges to make the ruling with the bang of the gavel saying "Oh.....you've been reformed and rehabilitated and ready to be re-introduced into the society." How are they going to ensure that ? Are the judges going to do it personally ? I'm not saying that those that have committed crimes don't deserve a second chance. However, it certainly has to depend on the nature of the crime. It isn't a simple "Oh...yes.....he or she felt remorseful. Therefore, he or she can be reformed and rehabilitated." You know.....I'm not saying all are like that.....but you got to question....how many of them feel remorseful and regret their actions because they truly do and not because of the fear of the consequences that they're about to face whether it's prison for life or the death penalty ? If, unfortunately, the outcome of that ruling did not have the effect that we all hoped for and he or she commits another crime and hurts other innocent people....what then ? Also, what about the victim's family and friends ? How are you ever going to justify any of this to them ? There's a lot to be considered....
|
|